Finally living in downtown Toronto. After growing up in the 905, schooling in the 215 and working in the 613, it's good to be in the 416 with a metrocard in my pocket.
Pushing for progressive change one post at a time
Well, at least for the first half of the campaign. I will be going on a long-planned trip to Mexico and Texas, each for a week, and will be back in Canada on September 28. Just in time to witness the last 16 days of the election campaign before Canadians vote on October 14th.
I can't say that I'm too excited about the upcoming campaign. Conservatives have way more money, Stephane Dion has so far been unable to really connect with Canadians and the corporate media will be busy fawning over the latest poll instead of doing any real reporting on policy issues that matter to Canadians.
As a staunch Liberal, I am not looking forward to the endless leaks and self-inflicted wounds that we are likely to see during this campaign. It has been happening to varying degrees since Dion won the leadership. I really do hope I'm wrong, but if the recent past is any indication, we will see a parade of unidentified highly placed liberals talking off-the-record second-guessing and undermining Dion. Frankly, there are just too many people within the Liberal party that will benefit from a Dion loss in this election. It's sad but true.
On the brighter side,
The expectations for Dion are so low that he is bound to surpass them and I hope he will surprise all of us with his performance
Maybe the wave of "Change" in the US will have some impact in Canada. One can hope, right?
I hope that Canadians take the time to find out what the Conservatives actually plan to do with a majority government. What's on their agenda? Other than bashing the Liberals, of course?
I will try to blog as much as I can. I will avoid discussing the polls and rather focus on the differing policy platforms of each party. In truth, I'm quite distracted with the Toronto International Film Festival so there will likely be a bunch of posts about the various movies that I will be seeing in the next week.
I was in disbelief when I heard the news this morning that John McCain has picked Sarah Palin as his running mate. Palin is an extreme right-wing self-described "hockey mom" who is currently embroiled in a scandal and who is completely unqualified for VP. She doesn't even know what the VP does! Given that McCain is 72 years old and has had problems with cancer, this pick is truly reckless and a completely political ploy with obviously no consideration for actually governing.
I'll have a more detailed post soon about my thoughts on Palin, but for now here is Obama spokesman Bill Burton's initial statement, which Obama has since distanced himself from, but nonetheless sums up how I feel:
"Today, John McCain put the former mayor of a town of 9,000 with zero foreign policy experience a heartbeat away from the presidency. Governor Palin shares John McCain's commitment to overturning Roe v. Wade, the agenda of Big Oil and continuing George Bush's failed economic policies -- that's not the change we need, it's just more of the same."
I spend most of my time reading blogs and news online and find myself wanting to talk and link to so many items that I end up posting on none of it. I hope to make "Today on the Blogs" a regular feature that will provide a bigger picture view of what is garnering my attention online. Please post links to anything you have found of interest.
Matt Yglesias, one of my favorite bloggers, has launched his new blog at ThinkProgress.org after leaving his previous post at The Atlantic. Take a look at this timeline of Yglesias' career since he graduated from Harvard in 2002
Barack Obama's new television ad "Embrace"addresses the numerous ways in which the special interests in Washington have embraced John McCain and how McCain has hugged right back, employing lobbyists in top positions and giving tax breaks to oil and drug companies, instead of working to ease the burden on middle-class families
A hybrid of some of the worst elements of authoritarian communism—mass surveillance of the population, total lack of civil liberties, lack of a free press, lack of democratic rights, authoritarian central planning, all harnessed not to advance the goals of social justice, even in name, although there may be some lip service still paid to that, but to advance the goals of global capitalism. So it is Stalinism meets global capitalism.
The goal of all this central planning and spying is not to celebrate the glories of Communism, regardless of what China's governing party calls itself. It is to create the ultimate consumer cocoon for Visa cards, Adidas sneakers, China Mobile cell phones, McDonald's happy meals, Tsingtao beer, and UPS delivery -- to name just a few of the official Olympic sponsors. But the hottest new market of all is the surveillance itself. Unlike the police states of Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, China has built a Police State 2.0, an entirely for-profit affair that is the latest frontier for the global Disaster Capitalism Complex.
I am a huge fan of Naomi Klein and reading all of this has reminded me to finally start reading Klein's latest book The Shock Doctrine, which has been sitting on my desk for the last few months.
Klein's insights are far from anything you will see in the traditional media's Olympic coverage. For example, in today's Globe and Mail - The Revolution Below:
Even in the political sphere, there is expanded leeway. China now leads the world in the number of Internet users – 250 million – and cellphone subscribers – more than 550 million people, who send tens of billions of short messages a day. Despite censorship, they use these new tools to push for more rights and openness, and to challenge the authorities with rising success.
The government still interferes, still rounds up severe critics, and has made life harder for foreign reporters since the Tibetan crisis in March. But China's progress since 2001 has been largely along the positive trajectory of the past three decades.
The Chinese enjoy more freedom than at any time in recent history. Ordinary Chinese people enthusiastically support the Beijing Olympics, contrary to many critics who label the Games as a government propaganda showcase.
It will be exciting to watch the democratizing force that expanded access to technology and information will have on Chinese society. Regardless of that potential, we need to remind ourselves of the political machine behind the scenes who are orchestrating an incredibly scripted and sanitized show for the world.
It cannot be considered unmannerly to note that as good as the show was, as smashing as the facilities are and as super-successful as the Games themselves probably will be, it all happened like this not only because of Chinese ingenuity, but also because the government could bulldoze homes when it needed land, put up walls whether or not they were wanted, dislocate folks at whim, spend like a drunken sailor, issue marching orders even about street-spitting and chest-baring and lock up, detain or 're-educate' anyone who dared whisper the mildest complaint.
As even Confucius said, in one of several quotations prominently displayed on screens at the ceremony, "The most valuable use of the rifles is to achieve harmony." Maybe he meant hegemony.
I've been watching Olympic coverage on four different channels: CBC, RDI (Radio-Canada), NBC and CBC Newsworld. CBC's online streaming and on demand video is pretty good so far although it only works with Internet Explorer :(
The opening ceremonies were orchestrated flawlessly and quite amazing to watch. So far the coverage on NBC has been much better than CBC. The NBC commentators are more knowledgeable and their explanations and analysis during the opening ceremonies put MacLean, Mansbridge and the CBC to shame. The men's cycling road race has been my favorite because of the amazing aerial shots of Beijing and the surrounding area. Michael Phelps set a new Olympic record in a preliminary heat and battle for medals has started with China having 2 gold and the US with 3 medals total.
I have also been reading a lot of coverage online. Here are some of the best:
Before the ceremonies, I was generally of the view that, because of its environmental degradation, internal human right's and worker's right's abuses, it should not have been awarded the Olympics games. However, watching the march of nations, it became clear to me why hosting the Olympics was so important to China, and why there really isn't a good argument to deny them these games.
Almost all the coverage I have watched or read has talked about the air pollution problem in Beijing. What I would love to see happen is for environmental issues to gain prominence and attention after seeing these glaring pollution problems.
What have you been noticing? Let me know of any good blogs covering the Olympics from Beijing?
For the last seven years, through clouds of construction dust, thousands of meetings, millions of man-hours and an unprecedented political mobilization, China has waited for today.
At $43 billion, the Beijing Olympics, which begin today, represent one of the most expensive coming-out parties in history. And the belle of the ball has a lot to be proud of. China has risen from poverty and social chaos to engineer one of the most impressive economic success stories ever.
With a single day to go before the Olympics, both government and independent readings suggest that Beijing's air is getting worse.
And if the winds don't change, this could wind up being one of the most polluted Olympics in modern history, with more particulate matter in the air than Atlanta in 1996 or possibly even notoriously smoggy Los Angeles in 1984.
