Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Blogs I Really Like Right Now

Some new blogs that have had some great posts about the renewal of the Liberal Party of Canada:

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Turning Talk into Action on Liberal Party Renewal

There has been a considerable amount of discussion and interest in reform and renewal of the Liberal Party of Canada after the historic loss in the election last Monday.

All my conversations with friends and what I've been reading online has re-energized me in the face of the brutal election results. I am convinced that we as young progressive and liberal Canadians have a huge opportunity to make our mark on the Liberal Party and contribute in building a better Canada.

To start, I wanted to react to a number of things that have been already written on-line. To be honest, there have been so much activity online it has been hard to keep track of it all, but here is my first take:

Rob Silver seemed to start it all off on the right foot with a number of great blog posts at the Globe that scope out what's next for the Liberal Party. Of the four camps that Rob references, I am firmly with Rob in the 2nd group:
2. Reform everything about the Liberal Party. Top-to-bottom. New blood, new voting coalition – there’s not much that stays the same in this new Liberal Party. This is obviously my preferred option and I will discuss it in more detail in the days and weeks to come.
Susan Delacourt provides a decent summary in this weekend's Toronto Star, despite the headline, where she surveys much of the discussion in the media about the future of the LiberalParty. Unfortunately, most of it is about leadership and merger, both topics that I have no interest in talking about right now. I don't think it is the time to be talking about leadership. The Liberals continually get caught up in these leadership battles at the expense of focusing time and energy on building grassroots organizations and institutions both within and outside the official Party who would, similar to organizations on the right, help to support and ultimately get a Liberal leader elected Prime Minister.

I very much agree with Vincent St. Pierre who argues on his blog Calgaryliberal.com that centrism is an electoral strategy, not a political philosophy, and that the Liberals should now start listening more closely to Preston Manning. Manning uses an iceberg metaphor to describe politics — parties in themselves represent the 10 per cent above the surface, while ideas, movements and activism form the 90 per cent you don’t see. St. Pierre writes:
I fear the Liberals have become ice cubes — a party for a party’s sake, and an accumulation of people interested in being in a party and implementing a party’s vision. A party without a base of support, that is. Being solely ‘centrist’ will not get the Liberals anywhere.
I couldn't agree more and on the "centrism" point specifically, Jesse Rosenberg nails it with the ending to his recent blog post:
That’s why our plan has to be to rebuild, and re-learn what it means to be really liberal, so we can start the mission of convincing Canadians to join a project, not a party
The other point from Manning about parties being only 10% rings very true to me, especially given my experience while I was in the U.S. during the Bush years. I saw first hand and participated in the development of progressive institutions and organizations that emerged to foster progressive activism and support for the Democratic Party. Canadian Liberals should look at the example down south, with the emergence of groups like Moveon.org, the Center for American Progress, the Campaign for America's Future, Media Matters and progressive blogging communities like DailyKos, OpenLeft and others.

Conservatives here in Canada get it. They have adopted the Republican strategy and developed right wing think tanks like the Fraser Institute, the Canada West Foundation and others. They recently founded the Manning Centre to help train and build the next generation of conservative activists and now have their very own version of Fox News with Sun TV News.

Given all this, I think we need to move beyond just talking and take some action. LiberalThinking is a modest start and I encourage you to check it out and consider contributing something yourself.

In recent days, I've been part of a number of discussions about what we as young liberals and those outside of the existing Liberal Party power structure can do to reform and rebuild the Party. If you are interested in getting involved please let me know.

~BT

Sunday, September 07, 2008

It's On!! Election 2008 on October 14

Stephen Harper has finally made it official: Canadians will go to the polls on October 14.

All the parties are launching their campaigns today. Dion is about to launch the Liberal campaign at a rally in Ottawa at 5pm and spoke earlier today from inside the Parliament buildings. Harper launched the Conservative campaign completely in French at a rally in Quebec City. Layton focused his attacks on the Harper government with the Parliament buildings in Ottawa as the backdrop. Elizabeth May continued to pound away on the inclusion of the Green party in the debates and was in Guelph today. Gilles Duceppe attacked Harper's conservative ideology today amid what is shaping up to be a disastrous campaign for the Bloc.

The NDP launched their first ad of the campaign on Harper's suppossed "strong leadership".

~BT

Friday, September 05, 2008

As an election gets underway, I'm leaving the country

Well, at least for the first half of the campaign. I will be going on a long-planned trip to Mexico and Texas, each for a week, and will be back in Canada on September 28. Just in time to witness the last 16 days of the election campaign before Canadians vote on October 14th.

I can't say that I'm too excited about the upcoming campaign. Conservatives have way more money, Stephane Dion has so far been unable to really connect with Canadians and the corporate media will be busy fawning over the latest poll instead of doing any real reporting on policy issues that matter to Canadians.

As a staunch Liberal, I am not looking forward to the endless leaks and self-inflicted wounds that we are likely to see during this campaign. It has been happening to varying degrees since Dion won the leadership. I really do hope I'm wrong, but if the recent past is any indication, we will see a parade of unidentified highly placed liberals talking off-the-record second-guessing and undermining Dion. Frankly, there are just too many people within the Liberal party that will benefit from a Dion loss in this election. It's sad but true.

On the brighter side,
  • The expectations for Dion are so low that he is bound to surpass them and I hope he will surprise all of us with his performance
  • Maybe the wave of "Change" in the US will have some impact in Canada. One can hope, right?
  • I hope that Canadians take the time to find out what the Conservatives actually plan to do with a majority government. What's on their agenda? Other than bashing the Liberals, of course?
I will try to blog as much as I can. I will avoid discussing the polls and rather focus on the differing policy platforms of each party. In truth, I'm quite distracted with the Toronto International Film Festival so there will likely be a bunch of posts about the various movies that I will be seeing in the next week.

~BT

Friday, August 29, 2008

McCain's VP pick is reckless

I was in disbelief when I heard the news this morning that John McCain has picked Sarah Palin as his running mate. Palin is an extreme right-wing self-described "hockey mom" who is currently embroiled in a scandal and who is completely unqualified for VP. She doesn't even know what the VP does! Given that McCain is 72 years old and has had problems with cancer, this pick is truly reckless and a completely political ploy with obviously no consideration for actually governing.

I'll have a more detailed post soon about my thoughts on Palin, but for now here is Obama spokesman Bill Burton's initial statement, which Obama has since distanced himself from, but nonetheless sums up how I feel:
"Today, John McCain put the former mayor of a town of 9,000 with zero foreign policy experience a heartbeat away from the presidency. Governor Palin shares John McCain's commitment to overturning Roe v. Wade, the agenda of Big Oil and continuing George Bush's failed economic policies -- that's not the change we need, it's just more of the same."
Cross-posted at Progressive Dispatches

~BT

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

Today on the Blogs

I spend most of my time reading blogs and news online and find myself wanting to talk and link to so many items that I end up posting on none of it. I hope to make "Today on the Blogs" a regular feature that will provide a bigger picture view of what is garnering my attention online. Please post links to anything you have found of interest.

In the Canadian Progressive Blogosphere:
From our neighbours to the south:
~BT

Monday, August 11, 2008

Obama Hits Back

Barack Obama's new television ad "Embrace" addresses the numerous ways in which the special interests in Washington have embraced John McCain and how McCain has hugged right back, employing lobbyists in top positions and giving tax breaks to oil and drug companies, instead of working to ease the burden on middle-class families


Update: Matt Stoller at Openleft reviews Obama's seven negative ads that his campaign has released so far this summer.

~BT

Saturday, August 09, 2008

McCommunism

Naomi Klein offers her poignant view of China in an interview with Paul Jay from the Real News:
A hybrid of some of the worst elements of authoritarian communism—mass surveillance of the population, total lack of civil liberties, lack of a free press, lack of democratic rights, authoritarian central planning, all harnessed not to advance the goals of social justice, even in name, although there may be some lip service still paid to that, but to advance the goals of global capitalism. So it is Stalinism meets global capitalism.


Klein has also authored a recent article in the Huffington Post describing China's "Police State 2.0":
The goal of all this central planning and spying is not to celebrate the glories of Communism, regardless of what China's governing party calls itself. It is to create the ultimate consumer cocoon for Visa cards, Adidas sneakers, China Mobile cell phones, McDonald's happy meals, Tsingtao beer, and UPS delivery -- to name just a few of the official Olympic sponsors. But the hottest new market of all is the surveillance itself. Unlike the police states of Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, China has built a Police State 2.0, an entirely for-profit affair that is the latest frontier for the global Disaster Capitalism Complex.
I am a huge fan of Naomi Klein and reading all of this has reminded me to finally start reading Klein's latest book The Shock Doctrine, which has been sitting on my desk for the last few months.

Klein's insights are far from anything you will see in the traditional media's Olympic coverage. For example, in today's Globe and Mail - The Revolution Below:

Even in the political sphere, there is expanded leeway. China now leads the world in the number of Internet users – 250 million – and cellphone subscribers – more than 550 million people, who send tens of billions of short messages a day. Despite censorship, they use these new tools to push for more rights and openness, and to challenge the authorities with rising success.

The government still interferes, still rounds up severe critics, and has made life harder for foreign reporters since the Tibetan crisis in March. But China's progress since 2001 has been largely along the positive trajectory of the past three decades.

The Chinese enjoy more freedom than at any time in recent history. Ordinary Chinese people enthusiastically support the Beijing Olympics, contrary to many critics who label the Games as a government propaganda showcase.

It will be exciting to watch the democratizing force that expanded access to technology and information will have on Chinese society. Regardless of that potential, we need to remind ourselves of the political machine behind the scenes who are orchestrating an incredibly scripted and sanitized show for the world.

Christie Blatchford has a great column in the Globe and Mail:
It cannot be considered unmannerly to note that as good as the show was, as smashing as the facilities are and as super-successful as the Games themselves probably will be, it all happened like this not only because of Chinese ingenuity, but also because the government could bulldoze homes when it needed land, put up walls whether or not they were wanted, dislocate folks at whim, spend like a drunken sailor, issue marching orders even about street-spitting and chest-baring and lock up, detain or 're-educate' anyone who dared whisper the mildest complaint.

As even Confucius said, in one of several quotations prominently displayed on screens at the ceremony, "The most valuable use of the rifles is to achieve harmony." Maybe he meant hegemony.

~BT

Olympic Cartoons




~BT